Henrica C. W. de Vet

COSMIN guideline for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures

The STARD statement for reporting studies of diagnostic accuracy: explanation and elaboration

The quality of reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy is less than optimal. Complete and accurate reporting is necessary to enable readers to assess the potential for bias ...

Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires

Are factor analytical techniques used appropriately in the validation of health status questionnaires? A systematic review on the quality of factor analysis of the SF-36

Psychometric properties of vision‐related quality of life questionnaires: a systematic review

Abstract The increased attention for quality of life (QOL) as an outcome measure has led to the development of numerous questionnaires to assess this construct in the field of o...

REPRODUCIBILITY AND RESPONSIVENESS OF EVALUATIVE OUTCOME MEASURES

Objective: This article outlines basic methods for quantifying reproducibility and responsiveness of evaluative outcome measures. Methods: The background noise in stable patient...

Changes to the subscales of two vision-related quality of life questionnaires are proposed

Observer Reliability and Agreement

Abstract The terms observer reliability and observer agreement represent different concepts. Reliability coefficients express the ability to differentiate between subjects. Agre...

Rating the methodological quality in systematic reviews of studies on measurement properties: a scoring system for the COSMIN checklist

Towards Complete and Accurate Reporting of Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy: The STARD Initiative

accuracy studies, readers must understand the design, conduct, analysis, and results of such studies. That goal can be achieved only through complete transparency from authors. ...

COSMIN methodology for evaluating the content validity of patient-reported outcome measures: a Delphi study