Abstract
Mimicry reveals something in so far as it is distinct from what might be called an itself that is behind. The discourse of post-Enlightenment English colonialism often speaks in a tongue that is forked, not false. If colonialism takes power in the name of history, it repeatedly exercises its authority through the figures of farce. The effect of mimicry on the authority of colonial discourse is profound and disturbing. A classic text of such partiality is Charles Grant’s ‘Observations on the state of society among the Asiatic subjects of Great Britain’ which was only superseded by James Mills’s History of India as the most influential early nineteenth-century account of Indian manners and morals. The absurd extravagance of Macaulay’s ‘Minute’ (1835) – deeply influenced by Charles Grant’s ‘Observations’ – makes a mockery of Oriental learning until faced with the challenge of conceiving of a ‘reformed’ colonial subject.
Keywords
MimicryColonialismEnlightenmentAmbivalencePower (physics)Subject (documents)State (computer science)FableParadiseHistoryLiteratureSociologyPhilosophyEpistemologyArtPsychoanalysisArt historyPsychology
Related Publications
Carnal Knowledge and Imperial Power
Why, Ann Laura Stoler asks, was the management of sexual arrangements and affective attachments so critical to the making of colonial categories and to what distinguished ruler ...
Publication Info
- Year
- 2019
- Type
- book-chapter
- Pages
- 152-160
- Citations
- 1216
- Access
- Closed
External Links
Social Impact
Altmetric
PlumX Metrics
Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions
Citation Metrics
1216
OpenAlex
Cite This
Homi Κ. Bhabha
(2019).
3. Of Mimicry and Man: The Ambivalence of Colonial Discourse.
, 152-160.
https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520918085-006
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1525/9780520918085-006