Abstract

We have discovered a weakness in the construction of the 6-311G basis set. The second set of three contracted s-functions is, in fact, not a valence orbital but is instead a 1s function. Thus in the s space this basis set is better represented as 63-11. Coupled with an earlier observation that additional diffuse p functions are required to yield results comparable to those of the Huzinaga–Dunning (10s6p/5s3p) triple-zeta basis set in certain cases, this suggests that greater caution should be exercised in the use of the 6-311G basis set.

Keywords

Valence (chemistry)Basis setBasis (linear algebra)Set (abstract data type)WeaknessMathematicsPhysicsComputer scienceQuantum mechanicsGeometryMoleculeMedicineSurgery

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

Publication Info

Year
1989
Type
article
Volume
91
Issue
11
Pages
7305-7306
Citations
83
Access
Closed

Social Impact

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

83
OpenAlex
1
Influential
80
CrossRef

Cite This

Roger S. Grev, Henry F. Schaefer (1989). 6-311G is not of valence triple-zeta quality. The Journal of Chemical Physics , 91 (11) , 7305-7306. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.457301

Identifiers

DOI
10.1063/1.457301

Data Quality

Data completeness: 77%