Abstract
In a recent edition of this journal, Borgatta et al. (1986), using hypothetical data, illustrated how the results produced by principal components analysis can be substantially different from those of common factor analysis. The present article, using seven well-known data sets, extends their work into the empirical domain, and also compares the results of the maximum likelihood factor analysis model with those of the principal components model. The results strongly support those of Borgatta et al. Indeed, the discrepancies in the empirical results reported here are often larger than their hypothetical example suggests. It was found that, when comparing the performance of the principal components model with the common factor and maximum likelihood models, differences can be expected to occur in (1) the magnitudes of the factor loadings, (2) the signs attached to the factor loadings, and, most important, (3) the interpretation of the factors themselves.
Keywords
Principal component analysisFactor analysisEconometricsStatisticsInterpretation (philosophy)Maximum likelihoodMathematicsComputer science
Affiliated Institutions
Related Publications
Estimation and Tests of Significance in Factor Analysis
A distinction is drawn between the method of principal components developed by Hotelling and the common factor analysis discussed in psychological literature both from the point...
Fitting the Factor Analysis Model
When the covariance matrix Σ(p×P) does not satisfy the formal factor analysis model for m factors, there will be no factor matrix Λ(p×m) such that γ=(Σ-ΛΛ′) is diagonal. The fac...
Factor Analysis and AIC
The information criterion AIC was introduced to extend the method of maximum likelihood to the multimodel situation. It was obtained by relating the successful experience of the...
The Effects of Overextraction on Factor and Component Analysis
The effects of overextracting factors and components within and between the methods of maximum likelihood factor analysis (MLFA) and principal component analysis (PCA) were exam...
An Empirical Comparison Of The Similarity Of Principal Component, Image, And Factor Patterns
Factor analysis, image component analysis, and principal component analysis are three methods that have been employed for the same purpose. Factor analysis was traditionally vie...
Publication Info
- Year
- 1987
- Type
- article
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 301-308
- Citations
- 36
- Access
- Closed
External Links
Social Impact
Altmetric
PlumX Metrics
Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions
Citation Metrics
36
OpenAlex
Cite This
Raymond Hubbard,
Stuart J. Allen
(1987).
A Cautionary Note on the Use of Principal Components Analysis.
Sociological Methods & Research
, 16
(2)
, 301-308.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124187016002005
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1177/0049124187016002005