Abstract

The parallel analysis method for determining the number of components to retain in a principal components analysis has received a recent resurgence of support and interest. However, researchers and practitioners desiring to use this criterion have been hampered by the required Monte Carlo analyses needed to develop the criteria. Two recent attempts at presenting regression estimation methods to determine eigenvalues were found to be deficient in several respects, and less accurate in general, than a simple linear interpolation of tabled random data eigenvalues generated through Monte Carlo simulation. Other methods for determining the parallel analysis criteria are discussed.

Keywords

Monte Carlo methodComputer scienceEconometricsStatisticsData miningMathematics

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

Meta-Analysis: A Comparison of Approaches

Meta-Analysis: A Comparison of Approaches Author: Schulze, Ralf, Bibliographic Data: (ISBN: 0-88937-280-2, Hogrefe & Huber Publishers, 2004, $39.95) 242 pages, hard cover. Subje...

2005 Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise 159 citations

Publication Info

Year
1989
Type
article
Volume
24
Issue
3
Pages
365-395
Citations
334
Access
Closed

External Links

Social Impact

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

334
OpenAlex

Cite This

Gary J. Lautenschlager (1989). A Comparison of Alternatives to Conducting Monte Carlo Analyses for Determining Parallel Analysis Criteria. Multivariate Behavioral Research , 24 (3) , 365-395. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr2403_6

Identifiers

DOI
10.1207/s15327906mbr2403_6