Abstract

Econometrics textbooks generally conclude that in regression, because the calculation of path estimate variances includes avariance inflation factor (VIF) that reflects correlations between “independent” constructs, multicollinearity should not causefalse positives except in extreme cases. However, textbook treatments of multicollinearity assume perfect measurement –rare in behavioral research. VIF is based on apparent correlations between constructs -- always less than actual correlationswhen measurement error exists. A brief review of recent articles in the MIS Quarterly suggests that the conditions forexcessive false positives are present in published research. In this paper we show (analytically and with a series of MonteCarlo simulations) that multicollinearity combined with measurement error presents greater than expected dangers from falsepositives in IS research when regression or PLS is used. Suggestions for how to address this situation are offered.

Keywords

MulticollinearityVariance inflation factorFalse positive paradoxVariance (accounting)EconometricsStatisticsMonte Carlo methodFalse positives and false negativesComputer scienceRegression analysisMathematicsEconomicsAccounting

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

Factor Analysis as a Tool for Survey Analysis

Factor analysis is particularly suitable to extract few factors from the large number of related variables to a more manageable number, prior to using them in other analysis suc...

2021 American Journal of Applied Mathemati... 1776 citations

Publication Info

Year
2011
Type
article
Citations
10
Access
Closed

External Links

Citation Metrics

10
OpenAlex

Cite This

Dale L. Goodhue, William W. Lewis, Ronald L. Thompson (2011). A Dangerous Blind Spot in IS Research: False Positives Due to Multicollinearity Combined With Measurement Error. AIS Electronic Library (AISeL) (Association for Information Systems) .