Abstract

A new hypothesis, based on differences in the rates at which populations of competing species approach competitive equilibrium (reduction or exclusion of some species), is proposed to explain patterns of species diversity. The hypothesis assumes that most communities exist in a state of nonequilibrium where competitive equilibrium is prevented by periodic population reductions and environmental fluctuations. When competitive equilibrium is prevented, a dynamic balance may be established between the rate of competitive displacement and the frequency of population reduction, which results in a stable level of diversity. Under conditions of infrequent reductions, an increase in the population growth rates of competitors generally results in decreased diversity. This model clarifies an underlying pattern of variation in diversity and points out the common elements of previous hypotheses. Rather than arguing that either competition, predation, or productivity control diversity, it demonstrates that all of these may contribute to the same basic mechanism. In doing so, it not only explains the correlations of the other hypotheses with patterns of diversity, but also explains the exceptions that these hypotheses could not explain. This hypothesis may be applied to variations of diversity both on a latitudinal gradient and within specific regions.

Keywords

Competitive exclusionDiversity (politics)EcologyCoexistence theoryBiologyCompetition (biology)PopulationCompetitor analysisStorage effectProductivityPredationInterspecific competitionSpecies diversityEconomicsDemography

Related Publications

Publication Info

Year
1979
Type
article
Volume
113
Issue
1
Pages
81-101
Citations
3365
Access
Closed

External Links

Social Impact

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

3365
OpenAlex

Cite This

Michael A. Huston (1979). A General Hypothesis of Species Diversity. The American Naturalist , 113 (1) , 81-101. https://doi.org/10.1086/283366

Identifiers

DOI
10.1086/283366