A Note on the Theme of Too Many Instruments<sup>*</sup>

2009 Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 4,666 citations

Abstract

Abstract The difference and system generalized method of moments (GMM) estimators are growing in popularity. As implemented in popular software, the estimators easily generate instruments that are numerous and, in system GMM, potentially suspect. A large instrument collection overfits endogenous variables even as it weakens the Hansen test of the instruments’ joint validity. This paper reviews the evidence on the effects of instrument proliferation, and describes and simulates simple ways to control it. It illustrates the dangers by replicating Forbes [ American Economic Review (2000) Vol. 90, pp. 869–887] on income inequality and Levine et al. [ Journal of Monetary Economics ] (2000) Vol. 46, pp. 31–77] on financial sector development. Results in both papers appear driven by previously undetected endogeneity.

Keywords

EndogeneityGeneralized method of momentsPopularityEstimatorEconometricsSuspectInstrumental variableEconomicsTheme (computing)Simple (philosophy)EstimationComputer scienceStatisticsMathematicsManagementPolitical sciencePanel dataLaw

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

Publication Info

Year
2009
Type
article
Volume
71
Issue
1
Pages
135-158
Citations
4666
Access
Closed

External Links

Social Impact

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

4666
OpenAlex

Cite This

David Roodman (2009). A Note on the Theme of Too Many Instruments<sup>*</sup>. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics , 71 (1) , 135-158. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0084.2008.00542.x

Identifiers

DOI
10.1111/j.1468-0084.2008.00542.x