Abstract

A discretionary policymaker can create surprise inflation, which may reduce employment and raise government revenue. But when people understand the policymaker's objectives, these surprises cannot occur systematically. In equilibrium people form expectations rationally and the policymaker optimizes in each period, subject to the way that people form expectations. Then, we find that (1) the rates of monetary growth and inflation are excessive; (2) these rates depend on the slope of Phillips curve, the natural unemployment rate, and other variables that affect the benefits and costs from inflation; (3) the monetary authority behaves countercyclically; and (4) unemployment is independent of money policy. Outcomes improve if rules commit future policy choices in the appropriate manner. The value of these commitments--which amount to long-term contracts between the government and the private sector--underlies the argument for rules over discretion.

Keywords

EconomicsMonetary policyCommitInflation (cosmology)DiscretionUnemploymentPrecommitmentSurpriseMonetary economicsArgument (complex analysis)Government (linguistics)Value (mathematics)MacroeconomicsMicroeconomics

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

Publication Info

Year
1983
Type
article
Volume
91
Issue
4
Pages
589-610
Citations
2181
Access
Closed

Social Impact

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

2181
OpenAlex
263
Influential
1548
CrossRef

Cite This

Robert J. Barro, D. Benjamin Gordon (1983). A Positive Theory of Monetary Policy in a Natural Rate Model. Journal of Political Economy , 91 (4) , 589-610. https://doi.org/10.1086/261167

Identifiers

DOI
10.1086/261167

Data Quality

Data completeness: 81%