Abstract

This article discusses: the doctrinal content of the group of ideas known as ‘new public management’(NPM); the intellectual provenance of those ideas; explanations for their apparent persuasiveness in the 1980 s; and criticisms which have been made of the new doctrines. Particular attention is paid to the claim that NPM offers an all‐purpose key to better provision of public services. This article argues that NFM has been most commonly criticized in terms of a claimed contradiction between ‘equity’ and ‘efficiency’ values, but that any critique which is to survive NPM's claim to ‘infinite reprogrammability’ must be couched in terms of possible conflicts between administrative values. The conclusion is that the ESRC'S Management in Government’ research initiative has been more valuable in helping to identify rather than to definitively answer, the key conceptual questions raised by NPM.

Keywords

ContradictionEquity (law)New public managementKey (lock)Government (linguistics)SociologyPositive economicsPublic managementPolitical sciencePublic administrationLaw and economicsEpistemologyEconomicsLawPublic sectorPhilosophy

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

Publication Info

Year
1991
Type
article
Volume
69
Issue
1
Pages
3-19
Citations
9159
Access
Closed

External Links

Social Impact

Altmetric

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

9159
OpenAlex

Cite This

Christopher Hood (1991). A PUBLIC MANAGEMENT FOR ALL SEASONS?. Public Administration , 69 (1) , 3-19. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.1991.tb00779.x

Identifiers

DOI
10.1111/j.1467-9299.1991.tb00779.x