Abstract
The null-hypothesis significance test based only on a p value can be a misleading approach to making an inference about the true (population or largesample) value of an effect statistic. Inferences based directly on the uncertainty in the true magnitude of the statistic are more comprehensible and practical but are not provided by statistical packages. I present here a spreadsheet that uses the p value, the observed value of the effect and smallest substantial values for the effect to make two kinds of magnitude-based inference: mechanistic and clinical. For a mechanistic inference the spreadsheet shows the effect as unclear if the confidence interval, which represents uncertainty about the true value, overlaps values that are substantial in a positive and negative sense; the effect is otherwise characterized with a statement about the chance that it is trivial, positive or negative. For a clinical inference the effect is shown as unclear if its chance of benefit is at least promising but its risk of harm is unacceptable; the effect is otherwise characterized with a statement about the chance that it is trivial, beneficial or harmful. The spreadsheet allows the researcher to choose the level of confidence (default, 90%) for mechanistic inferences and the threshold chances of benefit (default, 25%) and harm (default, 0.5%) for clinical inferences. The spreadsheet can be used for the most common effect statistics: raw, percent and factor differences in means; ratios of rates, risks, odds, and standard deviations; and correlations. The calculations are based on the same assumption of a normal or t sampling distribution that underlies the calculation of the p value for these statistics.
Keywords
Related Publications
An <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> statistic for fixed effects in the linear mixed model
Abstract Statisticians most often use the linear mixed model to analyze Gaussian longitudinal data. The value and familiarity of the R 2 statistic in the linear univariate model...
Likelihood Ratio Tests for Model Selection and Non-Nested Hypotheses
In this paper, we develop a classical approach to model selection. Using the Kullback-Leibler Information Criterion to measure the closeness of a model to the truth, we propose ...
A Direct Approach to False Discovery Rates
Summary Multiple-hypothesis testing involves guarding against much more complicated errors than single-hypothesis testing. Whereas we typically control the type I error rate for...
A robust <i>P</i>‐value for treatment effect in meta‐analysis with publication bias
Abstract Publication bias is a major and intractable problem in meta‐analysis. There have been several attempts in the literature to adapt methods to allow for such bias, but th...
Effect size, confidence interval and statistical significance: a practical guide for biologists
Abstract Null hypothesis significance testing (NHST) is the dominant statistical approach in biology, although it has many, frequently unappreciated, problems. Most importantly,...
Publication Info
- Year
- 2007
- Type
- article
- Volume
- 11
- Pages
- 16-21
- Citations
- 497
- Access
- Closed