Abstract

Abstract : Finding the unconstrained minimizer of a function of more than one variable is an important problem with many practical applications, including data fitting, engineering design, and process control. In addition, techniques for solving unconstrained optimization problems form the basis for most methods for solving constrained optimization problems. This paper surveys the state of the art for solving unconstrained optimization problems and the closely related problem of solving systems of nonlinear equations. First the authors briefly give some mathematical background. Then they discuss Newton's method, the fundamental method underlying most approaches to these problems, as well as the inexact Newton method. The two main practical deficiencies of Newton's method, the need for analytic derivatives and the possible failure to converge to the solution from poor starting points, are the key issues in unconstrained optimization, and the extension of these techniques to solving large, sparse problems. Then this document discusses the main methods used to ensure convergence from poor starting points, line search methods and trust region methods. Also discusses are two rather different approaches to unconstrained optimization, the Nelder-Meade simplex method and conjugate direction methods.

Keywords

MathematicsMathematical optimizationApplied mathematics

Related Publications

Preconditioning of Truncated-Newton Methods

In this paper we discuss the use of truncated-Newton methods, a flexible class of iterative methods, in the solution of large-scale unconstrained minimization problems. At each ...

1985 SIAM Journal on Scientific and Statis... 175 citations

Publication Info

Year
1987
Type
report
Citations
94
Access
Closed

Social Impact

Altmetric

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

94
OpenAlex
5
Influential
7
CrossRef

Cite This

J. E. Dennis, Schnabel Jr., B. D. Robert (1987). A View of Unconstrained Optimization.. . https://doi.org/10.21236/ada188327

Identifiers

DOI
10.21236/ada188327

Data Quality

Data completeness: 70%