Abstract

Abstract This study uses academic dishonesty as a unique type of fraudulent behavior upon which to test Gottfredson and Hirschi's general theory of crime. The study utilizes self‐report data from a survey of undergraduate students enrolled in sociology courses at a large southwestern university. With these data, the authors examine a number of the core theoretical propositions of Gottfredson and Hirschi's theory. That is, we test issues concerning the dimensionality of low self‐control, the influence of parenting on the development of self‐control, the association between levels of self‐control and involvement in academic dishonesty, and the interactive effects of low self‐control and opportunity on the frequency of academic dishonesty. The results of our analyses, although rather mixed, do provide qualified support for the theory.

Keywords

Academic dishonestyDishonestyCheatingTest (biology)PsychologyControl (management)Self-controlSocial psychologyCriminologyComputer science

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

Criminality and Psychiatric Disorders

Samuel B. Guzé

THE WIDESPREAD concern over the apparently increasing crime rate needs no documentation. The extent of criminal behavior may be suggested by the following quotation from the 196...

1969 Archives of General Psychiatry 284 citations

Publication Info

Year
1998
Type
article
Volume
19
Issue
3
Pages
227-255
Citations
269
Access
Closed

External Links

View on DOI.org

Social Impact

Altmetric
PlumX Metrics

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

269
OpenAlex

Cite This

John K. Cochran, Peter B. Wood, Christine S. Sellers et al. (1998). Academic dishonesty and low self‐control: An empirical test of a general theory of crime. Deviant Behavior , 19 (3) , 227-255. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639625.1998.9968087

Identifiers

DOI
10.1080/01639625.1998.9968087