Abstract

Adsorption technology has been widely applied in water and wastewater treatment, due to its low cost and high efficiency. The adsorption kinetic models have been used to evaluate the performance of the adsorbent and to investigate the adsorption mass transfer mechanisms. However, the physical meanings and the solving methods of the kinetic models have not been well established. The proper interpretation of the physical meanings and the standard solving methods for the adsorption kinetic models are very important for the applications of the kinetic models. This paper mainly focused on the physical meanings, applications, as well as the solving methods of 16 adsorption kinetic models. Firstly, the mathematical derivations, physical meanings and applications of the adsorption reaction models, the empirical models, the diffusion models, and the models for adsorption onto active sites were analyzed and discussed in detail. Secondly, the model validity evaluation equations were summarized based on literature. Thirdly, a convenient user interface (UI) for solving the kinetic models was developed based on Excel software and provided in supplementary information, which is helpful for readers to simulate the adsorption kinetic process.

Keywords

AdsorptionKinetic energyDiffusionMass transferEmpirical modellingThermodynamicsChemistryComputer scienceProcess engineeringPhysical chemistrySimulationPhysicsEngineeringClassical mechanics

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

Publication Info

Year
2020
Type
review
Volume
390
Pages
122156-122156
Citations
2389
Access
Closed

Social Impact

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

2389
OpenAlex
68
Influential
2246
CrossRef

Cite This

Jianlong Wang, Xuan Guo (2020). Adsorption kinetic models: Physical meanings, applications, and solving methods. Journal of Hazardous Materials , 390 , 122156-122156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.122156

Identifiers

DOI
10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.122156
PMID
32006847

Data Quality

Data completeness: 81%