Advanced Capitalism and Black/White Race Relations in the United States: A Split Labor Market Interpretation

1976 American Sociological Review 351 citations

Abstract

A distinguishing feature of the black position in advanced capitalism lies in relatively high unemployment and underemployment, a phenomenon that emerged in the 1930s and became firmly entrenched in the mid-1950s. To explain this we examined the black/white split labor market between World War I and the New Deal, showing how blacks were used to undermine white workers and their unions. The conflict was resolved with New Deal Labor legislation, protecting the unions and outlawing undercutting. This permitted a coalition to emerge between black and white workers. But in the long run the rising cost of labor drove capital to seek cheaper labor overseas, to make use of internal pockets of unprotected labor or to automate. All three processes hurt black industrial workers disproportionately, leaving a group of hardcore unemployed in the ghettos.

Keywords

CapitalismRace (biology)Interpretation (philosophy)White (mutation)SociologyEconomicsPolitical scienceLabour economicsGender studiesLawComputer science

Related Publications

Varieties of Capitalism

Abstract Applying the new economics of organization and relational theories of the firm to the problem of understanding cross‐national variation in the political economy, this v...

2001 8044 citations

Changes in Wage Rates Between 1959 and 1967

DESPITE the importance of wage rates in our understanding of economic activity, there are almost no wage data available appropriate for studying changes in the wages received by...

1971 The Review of Economics and Statistics 14 citations

Publication Info

Year
1976
Type
article
Volume
41
Issue
1
Pages
34-34
Citations
351
Access
Closed

External Links

Social Impact

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

351
OpenAlex

Cite This

Edna Bonacich (1976). Advanced Capitalism and Black/White Race Relations in the United States: A Split Labor Market Interpretation. American Sociological Review , 41 (1) , 34-34. https://doi.org/10.2307/2094371

Identifiers

DOI
10.2307/2094371