Abstract

The idea that alternative stable states may exist in communities has been a recurring theme in ecology since the late 1960s, and is now experiencing a resurgence of interest. Since the first papers on the subject appeared, two perspectives have developed to describe how communities shift from one stable state to another. One assumes a constant environment with shifts in variables such as population density, and the other anticipates changes to underlying parameters or environmental "drivers". We review the theory behind alternative stable states and examine to what extent these perspectives are the same, and in what ways they differ. We discuss the concepts of resilience and hysteresis, and the role of stochasticity within the two formulations. In spite of differences in the two perspectives, the same type of experimental evidence is required to demonstrate the existence of alternative stable states.

Keywords

EcologyAlternative stable stateTheme (computing)Psychological resilienceEcological systems theoryEnvironmental changePopulationResilience (materials science)Subject (documents)Constant (computer programming)Climate changeSociologyBiologyPsychologyComputer scienceDemographyEcosystemSocial psychologyPhysics

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

Publication Info

Year
2003
Type
review
Volume
1
Issue
7
Pages
376-382
Citations
1271
Access
Closed

External Links

Social Impact

Altmetric

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

1271
OpenAlex

Cite This

Beatrix E. Beisner, DT Haydon, Kim Cuddington (2003). Alternative stable states in ecology. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment , 1 (7) , 376-382. https://doi.org/10.1890/1540-9295(2003)001[0376:assie]2.0.co;2

Identifiers

DOI
10.1890/1540-9295(2003)001[0376:assie]2.0.co;2