Abstract
Much of the research conducted in organizational settings uses correlational techniques to infer associations among variables of interest. This paper reviews some of the problems with this type of research and develops a checklist for judging the validity of the research methods and designs employed. A sample of published correlational studies is evaluated, using the checklist. In many cases these studies were found to have serious design problems. Potential remedies and responses to these problems are discussed.
Keywords
Affiliated Institutions
Related Publications
Uses and abuses of coefficient alpha.
The article addresses some concerns about how coefficient alpha is reported and used. It also shows that alpha is not a measure of homogeneity or unidimensionality. This fact an...
Constructing validity: New developments in creating objective measuring instruments.
In this update of Clark and Watson (1995), we provide a synopsis of major points of our earlier article and discuss issues in scale construction that have become more salient as...
Factor analysis in the development and refinement of clinical assessment instruments.
The goals of both exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis are described and procedural guidelines for each approach are summarized, emphasizing the use of factor analysis i...
Decisions that make a difference in detecting differential item functioning
There are numerous statistical procedures for detecting items that function differently across subgroups of examinees that take a test or survey. However, in endeavouring to det...
Construct validity in psychological tests.
Validation of psychological tests has not yet been adequately conceptualized, as the APA Committee on Psychological Tests learned when it undertook (1950-54) to specify what qua...
Publication Info
- Year
- 1985
- Type
- article
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 192-205
- Citations
- 264
- Access
- Closed
External Links
Social Impact
Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions
Citation Metrics
Cite This
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.5465/amr.1985.4277939