An investigation of transmission control measures during the first 50 days of the COVID-19 epidemic in China

2020 Science 2,094 citations

Abstract

The most effective interventions By 23 January 2020, China had imposed a national emergency response to restrict travel and impose social distancing measures on its populace in an attempt to inhibit the transmission of severe acute respiratory syndrome–coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). However, which measures were most effective is uncertain. Tian et al. performed a quantitative analysis of the impact of control measures between 31 December 2019 and 19 February 2020, which encompasses the Lunar New Year period when millions of people traveled across China for family visits. Travel restrictions in and out of Wuhan were too late to prevent the spread of the virus to 262 cities within 28 days. However, the epidemic peaked in Hubei province on 4 February 2020, indicating that measures such as closing citywide public transport and entertainment venues and banning public gatherings combined to avert hundreds of thousands of cases of infection. It is unlikely that this decline happened because the supply of susceptible people was exhausted, so relaxing control measures could lead to a resurgence. Science , this issue p. 638

Keywords

ChinaSocial distanceCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)Psychological interventionSevere acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)Transmission (telecommunications)GeographySocioeconomics2019-20 coronavirus outbreakEnvironmental healthPandemicClosing (real estate)Public healthDemographyOutbreakMedicineAdvertisingBusinessVirologyEconomicsSociologyDiseaseEngineeringFinance

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

Publication Info

Year
2020
Type
article
Volume
368
Issue
6491
Pages
638-642
Citations
2094
Access
Closed

External Links

Social Impact

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

2094
OpenAlex

Cite This

Huaiyu Tian, Youngjoon Hong, Yidan Li et al. (2020). An investigation of transmission control measures during the first 50 days of the COVID-19 epidemic in China. Science , 368 (6491) , 638-642. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abb6105

Identifiers

DOI
10.1126/science.abb6105