Abstract

We use simple mathematical models to explore the indirect interactions between two prey species that share a predator when all three species undergo population cycles. The results are compared to analogous findings for systems that reach a stable equilibrium point. It is common for removal of one prey from a cycling system to result in a decrease in the mean density of the remaining prey species, contrary to the usual logic of apparent competition. Even when apparent competition between prey exists, its magnitude is usually reduced by population cycles. This effect occurs when the predator has a concave-down relationship between prey abundance and its own per capita growth rate. Such relationships can occur because of a saturating functional or numerical response. We investigate how prey density dependence and the shape of the predator's functional and numerical responses affect the sign and magnitude of this indirect interaction between prey species. There may also be (+, −) interactions between prey that differ significantly in their susceptibility to the common predator.

Keywords

Mutualism (biology)EcologyPredationBiologyCompetition (biology)

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

Publication Info

Year
1998
Type
article
Volume
79
Issue
1
Pages
201-201
Citations
32
Access
Closed

External Links

Social Impact

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

32
OpenAlex
5
CrossRef

Cite This

Peter A. Abrams, Robert D. Holt, James D. Roth (1998). Apparent Competition or Apparent Mutualism? Shared Predation When Populations Cycle. Ecology , 79 (1) , 201-201. https://doi.org/10.2307/176875

Identifiers

DOI
10.2307/176875

Data Quality

Data completeness: 77%