Abstract
Abstract The assessment of non‐compliance to a study medication is an important issue in the evaluation of clinical trials of self‐administered drugs. Traditional methods for evaluating the compliance of subjects include self‐reported questionnaires and pharmacologic assays of drug levels in randomly‐drawn blood samples, but each of these has important limitations. This paper adapts and extends changepoint methods to assess compliance from longitudinal data on laboratory markers that are affected by the drug. The maximum likelihood estimators for two models are developed and examined. The effect of the drug on the marker process, as well as the spacing of the observations of the marker process relative to the time of noncompliance determine which model parameters are estimable. For the situations examined, the method of maximum likelihood is found to perform well in most cases. However, when non‐compliance begins shortly before the last observation of the marker process, these (as well as any other) estimators cannot reliably distinguish non‐compliance from compliance. The methods are illustrated with an example from a recent clinical trial of persons infected with HIV.
Keywords
Affiliated Institutions
Related Publications
Surrogate Markers in AIDS: Where Are We? Where Are We Going?
Editorials1 April 1992Surrogate Markers in AIDS: Where Are We? Where Are We Going?Stephen W. Lagakos, PhD, Daniel F. Hoth, MDStephen W. Lagakos, PhD, Daniel F. Hoth, MDAuthor, A...
Importance of Surrogate Markers in Evaluation of Antiviral Therapy for HIV Infection
CONVENTIONAL randomized clinical trials of new treatments usually rely on clinical end points that directly show the effect of the new treatment on outcomes such as quality or l...
Efficient Laplacian and Adaptive Gaussian Quadrature Algorithms for Multilevel Generalized Linear Mixed Models
Mixed-effects models have become a popular approach for the analysis of grouped data that arise in many areas as diverse as clinical trials, epidemiology, and sociology. Example...
An introduction to instrumental variables for epidemiologists
Instrumental-variable (IV) methods were invented over 70 years ago, but remain uncommon in epidemiology. Over the past decade or so, non-parametric versions of IV methods have a...
ESTIMATING THE PROPORTION OF TREATMENT EFFECT EXPLAINED BY A SURROGATE MARKER
In this paper, we measure the extent to which a biological marker is a surrogate endpoint for a clinical event by the proportional reduction in the regression coefficient for th...
Publication Info
- Year
- 1994
- Type
- article
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 19-20
- Pages
- 2141-2153
- Citations
- 28
- Access
- Closed
External Links
Social Impact
Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions
Citation Metrics
Cite This
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1002/sim.4780131921