Abstract

Assessing the uncertainty due to possible systematic errors in a physical measurement unavoidably involves an element of subjective judgment. Examination of historical measurements and recommended values for the fundamental physical constants shows that the reported uncertainties have a consistent bias towards underestimating the actual errors. These findings are comparable to findings of persistent overconfidence in psychological research on the assessment of subjective probability distributions. Awareness of these biases could help in interpreting the precision of measurements, as well as provide a basis for improving the assessment of uncertainty in measurements.

Keywords

Overconfidence effectMeasurement uncertaintySystematic errorBasis (linear algebra)PhysicsPsychologyEconometricsCognitive psychologyStatisticsSocial psychologyMathematicsQuantum mechanics

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

Observer Reliability and Agreement

Abstract The terms observer reliability and observer agreement represent different concepts. Reliability coefficients express the ability to differentiate between subjects. Agre...

2005 Encyclopedia of Biostatistics 62 citations

Publication Info

Year
1986
Type
article
Volume
54
Issue
9
Pages
791-798
Citations
318
Access
Closed

External Links

Social Impact

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

318
OpenAlex

Cite This

Max Henrion, Baruch Fischhoff (1986). Assessing uncertainty in physical constants. American Journal of Physics , 54 (9) , 791-798. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.14447

Identifiers

DOI
10.1119/1.14447