Abstract

Games have intruded into popular, academic, and policy-maker awareness to an unprecedented level, and this creates new opportunities for advancing our understanding of the relationship of games to society. The author offers a new approach to games that stresses them as characterized by process. Games, the author argues, are domains of contrived contingency, capable of generating emergent practices and interpretations, and are intimately connected with everyday life to a degree heretofore poorly understood. This approach is both consistent with a range of existing social theory and avoids many of the limitations that have characterized much games scholarship to date, in particular its tendency toward unsustainable formalism and exceptionalism. Rather than seeing gaming as a subset of play, and therefore as an activity that is inherently separable, safe, and pleasurable, the author offers a pragmatic rethinking of games as social artifacts in their own right that are always in the process of becoming. This view both better accords with the experience of games by participants cross-culturally and bears the weight of the new questions being asked about games and about society.

Keywords

ContingencySociologyEpistemologyScholarshipEveryday lifeExceptionalismFormalism (music)Social worldsSocial psychologyPsychologyPolitical scienceSocial sciencePoliticsLaw

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

Publication Info

Year
2007
Type
article
Volume
2
Issue
2
Pages
95-113
Citations
396
Access
Closed

External Links

Social Impact

Altmetric
PlumX Metrics

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

396
OpenAlex

Cite This

Thomas M. Malaby (2007). Beyond Play. Games and Culture , 2 (2) , 95-113. https://doi.org/10.1177/1555412007299434

Identifiers

DOI
10.1177/1555412007299434