Abstract

Abstract We present the biogeochemical cycling of dissolved zinc (dZn) in marginal and open waters of the Indian Ocean using a high‐resolution dataset collected during multiple GEOTRACES‐India (GI) cruises. Atmospheric dust deposition is a minor source compared to continental shelf inputs for dZn in photic waters of the northern Indian Ocean. A strong linear relationship between dZn and silicate (Si) is noted across the Indian Ocean, with lower slope ratios (dZn : Si) in the Arabian Sea (0.045 ± 0.001 nM μ M −1 ) and Bay of Bengal (0.049 ± 0.001 nM μ M −1 ) relative to the southern tropical Indian Ocean (STIO, 0.062 ± 0.002 nM μ M −1 ). We investigated these regional differences using an inverse modeling approach by quantifying the fractional contribution of each water mass to the measured dZn concentrations in the water column. Our results indicate that water mass mixing and scavenging are the primary mechanisms controlling dZn distribution in the region. Scavenging of dZn in the intermediate waters is likely driving the lower dZn‐Si regression slopes in the northern Indian Ocean. Intense scavenging may result from zinc sulfide formation in anoxic microenvironments of poorly ventilated waters or adsorption onto sinking particles. Dissolved Zn in excess of its preformed component is nearly twice as high in deep waters of the northern Indian Ocean compared to the STIO, suggesting desorption of previously scavenged Zn and/or presence of regional deep sources. These findings advance our understanding of regional zinc cycling in the Indian Ocean.

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

Publication Info

Year
2025
Type
article
Citations
0
Access
Closed

Social Impact

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

0
OpenAlex
0
Influential

Cite This

Venkatesh Chinni, Naman Deep Singh, Sunil Kumar Singh et al. (2025). Biogeochemical cycling of dissolved zinc in the Indian Ocean. Limnology and Oceanography . https://doi.org/10.1002/lno.70286

Identifiers

DOI
10.1002/lno.70286

Data Quality

Data completeness: 72%