Abstract

Abstract Although bone development during embryogenesis and bone repair after injury have a number of features which appear similar, they are distinctly different processes which involve separate controlling elements and cuing parameters. Repair of bone is influenced by bioactive factors which reside in bone itself; some of these factors are not present when embryonic mesenchymal cells first differentiate. For example, a bone protein which induces the conversion of mesenchymal cells into cartilage cells is not present in the embryo at the site where cartilage first differentiates into the anlagen for future bone. Ultimately, the sequence of cellular and molecular events which controls the success of bone repair is dependent on the prior embryologic and developmental packaging of bioactive factors into bone and the release of these factors at a bone break site. The success of the reparative events depends not only upon the release of these bone‐derived factors but also on systemic factors and the identity and numbers of responding cells at the repair site.

Keywords

Mesenchymal stem cellCartilageCell biologyBone healingBone cellEmbryonic stem cellBiologyAnatomyGenetics

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

Mesenchymal stem cells

Abstract Bone and cartilage formation in the embryo and repair and turnover in the adult involve the progeny of a small number of cells called mesenchymal stem cells. These cell...

1991 Journal of Orthopaedic Research® 6439 citations

Bone Development

The sequential cellular and molecular details of the initial embryonic formation of bone can be used to gain insight into the control of this process and subsequent bone physiol...

2007 Novartis Foundation symposium 16 citations

Publication Info

Year
1987
Type
article
Volume
6
Issue
4
Pages
171-175
Citations
72
Access
Closed

External Links

Social Impact

Altmetric

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

72
OpenAlex

Cite This

Arnold I. Caplan (1987). Bone development and repair. BioEssays , 6 (4) , 171-175. https://doi.org/10.1002/bies.950060406

Identifiers

DOI
10.1002/bies.950060406