Abstract

Abstract A structural model is proposed which integrates and extends previous findings on the interrelations between risk—return outcomes, market share, firm conduct attributes, and inter‐firm rivalry. It is argued that the relative impact of market share and firm conduct attributes on risk—return outcomes depends on the intensity of rivalry. The empirical setting is commerical banking in Indiana (1975–79). Latent variable path analysis (partial least‐squares) is used to estimate the model. The effect of market share is found to be quite important, even when possible ‘spurious’ effects due to differences in individual firm attributes are controlled for. Given consistent indications of oligopolistic coordination found in various parts of the model, it is inferred that the measured effect of market share reflects the exercise of market power.

Keywords

RivalrySpurious relationshipMarket powerMarket shareOligopolyEconomicsMarket structureMicroeconomicsEconometricsLatent variableBusinessIndustrial organizationMarketingComputer science

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

Market Networks and Corporate Behavior

Data on market relations between a large population of corporations and investment banks are used to study the organization-market interforce-the pattern of direct market ties b...

1990 American Journal of Sociology 1209 citations

Publication Info

Year
1989
Type
article
Volume
10
Issue
6
Pages
507-522
Citations
208
Access
Closed

External Links

Social Impact

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

208
OpenAlex

Cite This

Karel Cool, Ingemar Dierickx, David B. Jemison (1989). Business strategy, market structure and risk‐return relationships: A structural approach. Strategic Management Journal , 10 (6) , 507-522. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250100602

Identifiers

DOI
10.1002/smj.4250100602