Abstract

A two-asset, intertemporal portfolio selection model is formulated incorporating proportional transaction costs. The demand for assets is shown to be sensitive to these costs. However, transaction costs have only a second-order effect on the liquidity premia implied by equilibrium asset returns: the derived utility is insensitive to deviations from the optimal portfolio proportions, and investors accommodate large transaction costs by drastically reducing the frequency and volume of trade. A single-period model with an appropriately chosen length of period does not imply the same liquidity premium as the intertemporal model because the appropriate length of the time period is asset specific.

Keywords

Transaction costMarket liquidityEconomicsPortfolioAsset (computer security)MicroeconomicsCapital asset pricing modelLiquidity premiumEconometricsGeneral equilibrium theoryReplicating portfolioConsumption-based capital asset pricing modelLiquidity riskMonetary economicsFinancial economicsPortfolio optimizationComputer science

Related Publications

Publication Info

Year
1986
Type
article
Volume
94
Issue
4
Pages
842-862
Citations
1145
Access
Closed

External Links

Social Impact

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

1145
OpenAlex

Cite This

George M. Constantinides (1986). Capital Market Equilibrium with Transaction Costs. Journal of Political Economy , 94 (4) , 842-862. https://doi.org/10.1086/261410

Identifiers

DOI
10.1086/261410