Cases in which Parsimony or Compatibility Methods will be Positively Misleading

1978 Systematic Biology 2,927 citations

Abstract

For some simple three- and four-species cases involving a character with two states, it is determined under what conditions several methods of phylogenetic inference will fail to converge to the true phylogeny as more and more data are accumulated. The methods are the Camin-Sokal parsimony method, the compatibility method, and Farris's unrooted Wagner tree parsimony method. In all cases the conditions for this failure (which is the failure to be statistically consistent) are essentially that parallel changes exceed informative, nonparallel changes. It is possible for these methods to be inconsistent even when change is improbable a priori, provided that evolutionary rates in different lineages are sufficiently unequal. It is by extension of this approach that we may provide a sound methodology for evaluating methods of phylogenetic inference.

Keywords

Phylogenetic treeInferenceMaximum parsimonyBiologyA priori and a posterioriPhylogeneticsCharacter evolutionCompatibility (geochemistry)TaxonStatisticsEvolutionary biologyMathematicsComputer scienceEcologyCladeArtificial intelligenceEpistemologyGenetics

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

Publication Info

Year
1978
Type
article
Volume
27
Issue
4
Pages
401-410
Citations
2927
Access
Closed

External Links

Social Impact

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

2927
OpenAlex

Cite This

Joe Felsenstein (1978). Cases in which Parsimony or Compatibility Methods will be Positively Misleading. Systematic Biology , 27 (4) , 401-410. https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/27.4.401

Identifiers

DOI
10.1093/sysbio/27.4.401