Abstract

We review the eight prospective and seven retrospective studies from which it is possible to derive the complication rate of conventional cerebral angiography for patients with mild ischemic cerebrovascular disease who are potential candidates for carotid endarterectomy. Three studies of intravenous and one of intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography are also examined. An overview of the results suggests that the risk of a neurological complication (TIA or stroke) is about 4% and that a permanent neurological deficit (disabling stroke) occurs in about 1%. The mortality rate is very low (less than 0.1%). Systemic complications are not infrequent, particularly with intravenous digital subtraction angiography. The complication rate of cerebral angiography must be considered when evaluating the risks of carotid endarterectomy in patients with ischemic cerebrovascular disease.

Keywords

MedicineCarotid endarterectomyDigital subtraction angiographyComplicationStroke (engine)AngiographyCerebral angiographyRadiologyCardiologyVascular diseaseSurgeryInternal medicineStenosis

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

Guidelines for the Early Management of Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke: 2019 Update to the 2018 Guidelines for the Early Management of Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Guideline for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association

Background and Purpose— The purpose of these guidelines is to provide an up-to-date comprehensive set of recommendations in a single document for clinicians caring for adult pat...

2019 Stroke 6607 citations

Publication Info

Year
1990
Type
review
Volume
21
Issue
2
Pages
209-222
Citations
506
Access
Closed

External Links

Social Impact

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

506
OpenAlex

Cite This

Graeme J. Hankey, Charles Warlow, R. J. Sellar (1990). Cerebral angiographic risk in mild cerebrovascular disease.. Stroke , 21 (2) , 209-222. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.str.21.2.209

Identifiers

DOI
10.1161/01.str.21.2.209