Abstract

A prominent sector of nanotechnology is occupied by a class of carbon-based nanoparticles known as fullerenes. Fullerene particle size and shape impact in how easily these particles are transported into and throughout the environment and living tissues. Currently, there is a lack of adequate methodology for their size and shape characterisation, identification and quantitative detection in environmental and biological samples. The most commonly used methods for their size measurements (aggregation, size distribution, shape, etc.), the effect of sampling and sample treatment on these characteristics and the analytical methods proposed for their determination in complex matrices are discussed in this review. For the characterisation and analysis of fullerenes in real samples, different analytical techniques including microscopy, spectroscopy, flow field-flow fractionation, electrophoresis, light scattering, liquid chromatography and mass spectrometry have been reported. The existing limitations and knowledge gaps in the use of these techniques are discussed and the necessity to hyphenate complementary ones for the accurate characterisation, identification and quantitation of these nanoparticles is highlighted.

Keywords

FullereneChemistryField flow fractionationNanotechnologyNanoparticleCarbon NanoparticlesParticle sizeMass spectrometryFractionationAnalytical techniqueParticle (ecology)Analytical Chemistry (journal)ChromatographyMaterials scienceOrganic chemistry

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

Publication Info

Year
2015
Type
review
Volume
882
Pages
1-21
Citations
201
Access
Closed

Social Impact

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

201
OpenAlex
1
Influential
190
CrossRef

Cite This

Alina Astefanei, Óscar Núñez, Maria Teresa Galceran (2015). Characterisation and determination of fullerenes: A critical review. Analytica Chimica Acta , 882 , 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2015.03.025

Identifiers

DOI
10.1016/j.aca.2015.03.025
PMID
26043086

Data Quality

Data completeness: 86%