Abstract

The chitin from pogonophore tubes is shown to be essentially the same as that from the pen of the squid Loligo and is classified as β-chitin (as are the known chitins in annelids). However, certain important differences in detail are seen when comparing X-ray diffraction photographs and infra-red absorption spectra of the chitin from the two sources. These matters are of interest in defining the systematic position of the Pogonophora as well as in reaching an understanding of the functions of the protective tube.

Keywords

ChitinSquidLoligoChemistryBiologyFisheryBiochemistryChitosan

Related Publications

ECOLOGICAL SUCCESSION

1. Fishes have definite habitat preferences which cause them to be definitely arranged in streams which have a graded series of conditions from mouth to source. 2. Beginning at ...

1911 Biological Bulletin 137 citations

Publication Info

Year
1965
Type
article
Volume
45
Issue
3
Pages
659-661
Citations
77
Access
Closed

Social Impact

Altmetric

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

77
OpenAlex
0
Influential
68
CrossRef

Cite This

John Blackwell, Kate Parker, K.M. Rudall (1965). Chitin in pogonophore tubes. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , 45 (3) , 659-661. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0025315400016489

Identifiers

DOI
10.1017/s0025315400016489

Data Quality

Data completeness: 77%