Abstract

This formal review suggests that statistical methods are often used inappropriately in the urology literature, thereby, potentially undermining the validity of study results and conclusions. An effort to raise the awareness of appropriate statistical techniques through postgraduate education appears indicated.

Keywords

MedicineUrologyMedical physics

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

Publication Info

Year
2005
Type
article
Volume
174
Issue
4 Part 1
Pages
1374-1379
Citations
85
Access
Closed

External Links

Social Impact

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

85
OpenAlex

Cite This

Charles D. Scales, Regina D. Norris, Bercedis L. Peterson et al. (2005). CLINICAL RESEARCH AND STATISTICAL METHODS IN THE UROLOGY LITERATURE. The Journal of Urology , 174 (4 Part 1) , 1374-1379. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ju.0000173640.91654.b5

Identifiers

DOI
10.1097/01.ju.0000173640.91654.b5