Abstract

While much recent progress has been made in research on fact-based question answering, our work aims to extend question-answering research in a different direction ─ to handle multi-perspective question-answering tasks, i.e. question-answering tasks that require an ability to find and organize opinions in text. In particular, this paper proposes an approach to multi-perspective question answering that views the task as one of opinion-oriented information extraction. We first describe an annotation scheme developed for the low-level representation of opinions, and note the results of interannotator agreement studies using the opinion-based annotation framework. Next, we propose the use of opinion-oriented “scenario templates ” to act as a summary representation of the opinions expressed in a document, a set of documents, or an arbitrary text segment. Finally, we outline an approach for the automatic construction of opinion-based summary representations and describe how they might be used to support a variety of multi-perspective question answering tasks.

Keywords

Question answeringComputer sciencePerspective (graphical)Variety (cybernetics)Information retrievalRepresentation (politics)Set (abstract data type)Task (project management)AnnotationScheme (mathematics)Artificial intelligenceMathematics

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

A Theory of Social Comparison Processes

Hypothesis I: There exists, in the human organism, a drive to evaluate his opinions and his abilities. While opinions and abilities may, at first glance, seem to be quite differ...

1954 Human Relations 19493 citations

Publication Info

Year
2003
Type
article
Pages
20-27
Citations
91
Access
Closed

External Links

Citation Metrics

91
OpenAlex

Cite This

Claire Cardie, Janyce Wiebe, Theresa Wilson et al. (2003). Combining Low-Level and Summary Representations of Opinions for Multi-Perspective Question Answering. , 20-27.