Abstract

Visual inspection of lipemic, icteric and hemolyzed samples is highly unreliable and should be replaced by automated systems that report serum indices.

Keywords

ComparabilityAutomated methodComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceChromatographyChemistryMathematics

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

The concept of power

What is "power"? Most people have an intuitive notion of what it means. But scientists have not yet formulated a statement of the concept of power that is rigorous enough to be ...

2007 Systems Research and Behavioral Science 3665 citations

Publication Info

Year
2009
Type
article
Volume
47
Issue
11
Pages
1361-5
Citations
107
Access
Closed

External Links

Social Impact

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

107
OpenAlex

Cite This

Ana-Maria Šimundić, Nora Nikolac, Valentina Ivankovic et al. (2009). Comparison of visual vs. automated detection of lipemic, icteric and hemolyzed specimens: can we rely on a human eye?. Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM) , 47 (11) , 1361-5. https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm.2009.306

Identifiers

DOI
10.1515/cclm.2009.306