Abstract

W. Brian Arthur's model for competing technologies is discussed from the perspective of evolution theory. Using Arthur's own model for the simulation, we show that 'lock-ins' can be suppressed by adding reflexivity or uncertainty on the side of consumers. Competing technologies then tend to remain in competition. From an evolutionary perspective, lock-ins and prevailing equilibrium can be considered as different trajectories of the techno-economic systems under study. Our simulation results suggest that technological developments which affect the natural preferences of consumers do not induce changes in trajectory, while changes in network parameters of a technology sometimes induce ordered substitution processes. These substitution processes have been shown empirically (e.g., Fisher & Prey, 1971), but hitherto they have been insufficiently understood from the perspective of evolutionary modelling. The dynamics of the selective network determine the possible dissolution of a lock-in given the presence of competing technologies.

Keywords

Lock (firearm)Perspective (graphical)Competition (biology)Computer scienceSubstitution (logic)Evolutionary dynamicsIndustrial organizationEconomicsSociologyEngineeringEcologyArtificial intelligenceBiology

Related Publications

Publication Info

Year
1998
Type
article
Pages
309-323
Citations
24
Access
Closed

External Links

Social Impact

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

24
OpenAlex

Cite This

Loet Leydesdorff, Peter van den Besselaar (1998). Competing technologies: Lock-ins and lock-outs. AIP conference proceedings , 309-323. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.56335

Identifiers

DOI
10.1063/1.56335