Abstract

We tested the hypothesis that hostility is associated with increased relative risk (RR) for coronary death and nonfatal myocardial infarction among participants in the prospective Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial (MRFIT). Cases (N = 192) were compared with matched controls (N = 384) on a variety of behavioral characteristics associated with the Type A behavior pattern (TABP), including three different but interrelated components of hostility. Logistic regression analyses revealed that only two of the eight TABP attributes analyzed on the overall sample were significant. Only total Potential for Hostility, when dichotomized into "low" and "high" categories, and the antagonistic interpersonal component of hostility (Stylistic Hostility) had positive unadjusted associations with coronary heart disease (CHD) incidence (RR = 1.7, p = 0.003; and RR = 1.5, p = 0.016, respectively). The global TABP and related paralinguistic attributes were not significantly related to CHD incidence. After adjustment for the traditional risk factors of age, serum cholesterol, blood pressure, and cigarette smoking, only dichotomous Potential for Hostility showed a significant relative risk (RR = 1.5, p = 0.032). Ordinal logistic regression revealed a nonsignificant effect.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Keywords

HostilityRisk factorMedicineType A and Type B personality theoryMyocardial infarctionLogistic regressionRelative riskIncidence (geometry)Internal medicinePsychologyClinical psychologyCoronary heart diseaseConfidence interval

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

Publication Info

Year
1989
Type
article
Volume
51
Issue
5
Pages
514-522
Citations
386
Access
Closed

External Links

Social Impact

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

386
OpenAlex

Cite This

Théodore M. Dembroski, James M. MacDougall, Paul T. Costa et al. (1989). Components of hostility as predictors of sudden death and myocardial infarction in the Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial.. Psychosomatic Medicine , 51 (5) , 514-522. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006842-198909000-00003

Identifiers

DOI
10.1097/00006842-198909000-00003