Abstract

In a survey of 200 depressed patients, clinical symptoms of depression were assessed by both semistructured clinical interview and self-report. Both instruments were given during the acute episode and at follow-up, ten months later, when a majority of patients had recovered. Results indicate concordance between clinical assessment and self-report is low during the acute episode but generally improved at follow-up. Ratings of individual symptoms show a fair degree of specificity. The overall assessment of severity during the acute episode is particularly discordant. These findings demonstrate that self-reports are useful in measuring the presence or absence of symptoms and therefore valuable in assessing recovery. However, self-report ratings from acutely depressed patients are not a reliable estimate of the severity of their symptoms.

Keywords

ConcordanceDepression (economics)MedicinePsychiatryPsychologySelf-report studyClinical psychologyInternal medicine

Related Publications

The Stages of Mania

The progression of symptoms during an acute manic episode was studied retrospectively in 20 bipolar manic-depressive patients whose diagnosis was reconfirmed at follow-up. Three...

1973 Archives of General Psychiatry 419 citations

Publication Info

Year
1972
Type
article
Volume
26
Issue
6
Pages
546-546
Citations
207
Access
Closed

External Links

Social Impact

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

207
OpenAlex

Cite This

Brigitte A. Prusoff (1972). Concordance Between Clinical Assessments and Patients' Self-Report in Depression. Archives of General Psychiatry , 26 (6) , 546-546. https://doi.org/10.1001/archpsyc.1972.01750240058009

Identifiers

DOI
10.1001/archpsyc.1972.01750240058009