Abstract

Consensual knowledge can produce widely varying levels of impact on different international negotiations. In the case of negotiations over UNCTAD's Integrated Program for Commodities, consensual knowledge developed among the experts involved. This consensus tended to support the position taken by the developed countries, thus pointing in a direction already taken for other reasons. Consensus in this case facilitated an agreement, but empirical and theoretical analysis both suggest it may prove to be an incorrect or unstable agreement. The outcome of the commodity negotiations implies that the interaction of key variables, such as uncertainty and the degree of acceptance of the knowledge, might yield different results in other cases. Various specific means might be used more effectively to diffuse expert knowledge among policy makers.

Keywords

NegotiationCommodityPosition (finance)Outcome (game theory)Yield (engineering)Key (lock)Knowledge managementBusinessInternational tradePolitical scienceEconomicsComputer scienceMicroeconomicsMarket economyComputer security

Related Publications

Publication Info

Year
1984
Type
article
Volume
38
Issue
4
Pages
733-762
Citations
17
Access
Closed

External Links

Social Impact

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

17
OpenAlex

Cite This

Robert L. Rothstein (1984). Consensual knowledge and international collaboration: some lessons from the commodity negotiations. International Organization , 38 (4) , 733-762. https://doi.org/10.1017/s002081830002693x

Identifiers

DOI
10.1017/s002081830002693x