Abstract
Issues in the constraints on the validity of computerized psychiatric diagnosis are illustrated by the analysis of diagnoses produced by treating clinicians, expert diagnosticians, and the DIAGNO III computer diagnostic system. The results indicate modest agreement between the computerized diagnoses and both clinicians and experts, and not much better agreement between the experts and between the treating clinicians. The main constraint on the validity of computerized diagnoses is not in any inherent limitation on computer processing but rather in the limitations of the current diagnostic system itself. Improvements in computer diagnosis await improvements in the diagnostic system, along the lines of simplification, explicit criteria, and limitation of the categories to those conditions for which validity evidence exists.
Keywords
Related Publications
DIAGNO II: Further Developments in a Computer Program for Psychiatric Diagnosis
DIAGNO II, a computer program for psychiatric diagnosis, is based on a logical decision tree model similar to the differential diagnostic process used in clinical medicine. In t...
DIAGNO
IN RECENT YEARS there has been increased interest in using computers to arrive at a clinical diagnosis. Part of the present well-documented unreliability of psychiatric diagnose...
A Comparison of the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-III-R and Clinical Diagnoses
The relationship between diagnoses generated by the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-III-R Personality Disorders (SCID) and by nonstructured psychiatric interviews was exam...
Best Estimate of Lifetime Psychiatric Diagnosis
It is important for genetic, epidemiologic, and nosological studies to determine accurate rates of lifetime psychiatric diagnoses in patient and nonpatient populations. As part ...
Autism screening questionnaire: Diagnostic validity
Background Good interview and diagnostic measures for autism and other pervasive developmental disorders (PDDs) are available but there is a lack of a good screening questionnai...
Publication Info
- Year
- 1974
- Type
- article
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 197-197
- Citations
- 83
- Access
- Closed
External Links
Social Impact
Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions
Citation Metrics
Cite This
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1001/archpsyc.1974.01760140049008