Abstract

Abstract Qualitative content analysis and thematic analysis are two commonly used approaches in data analysis of nursing research, but boundaries between the two have not been clearly specified. In other words, they are being used interchangeably and it seems difficult for the researcher to choose between them. In this respect, this paper describes and discusses the boundaries between qualitative content analysis and thematic analysis and presents implications to improve the consistency between the purpose of related studies and the method of data analyses. This is a discussion paper, comprising an analytical overview and discussion of the definitions, aims, philosophical background, data gathering, and analysis of content analysis and thematic analysis, and addressing their methodological subtleties. It is concluded that in spite of many similarities between the approaches, including cutting across data and searching for patterns and themes, their main difference lies in the opportunity for quantification of data. It means that measuring the frequency of different categories and themes is possible in content analysis with caution as a proxy for significance.

Keywords

Thematic analysisContent analysisDescriptive statisticsQualitative analysisConsistency (knowledge bases)Thematic mapThematic structureQualitative researchData scienceData analysisPsychologyComputer scienceSociologyData miningSocial scienceStatisticsMathematics

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

Publication Info

Year
2013
Type
review
Volume
15
Issue
3
Pages
398-405
Citations
7831
Access
Closed

External Links

Social Impact

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

7831
OpenAlex

Cite This

Mojtaba Vaismoradi, Hannele Turunen, Terese Bondas (2013). Content analysis and thematic analysis: Implications for conducting a qualitative descriptive study. Nursing and Health Sciences , 15 (3) , 398-405. https://doi.org/10.1111/nhs.12048

Identifiers

DOI
10.1111/nhs.12048