Abstract
Abstract Estimating protein–protein interaction energies is a very challenging task for current simulation protocols. Here, absolute binding free energies are reported for the complex H‐Ras/C‐Raf1 using the MM‐PB(GB)SA approach, testing the internal consistency and model dependence of the results. Averaging gas‐phase energies (MM), solvation free energies as determined by Generalized Born models (GB/SA), and entropic contributions calculated by normal mode analysis for snapshots obtained from 10 ns explicit‐solvent molecular dynamics in general results in an overestimation of the binding affinity when a solvent‐accessible surface area‐dependent model is used to estimate the nonpolar solvation contribution. Applying the sum of a cavity solvation free energy and explicitly modeled solute–solvent van der Waals interaction energies instead provides less negative estimates for the nonpolar solvation contribution. When the polar contribution to the solvation free energy is determined by solving the Poisson–Boltzmann equation (PB) instead, the calculated binding affinity strongly depends on the atomic radii set chosen. For three GB models investigated, different absolute deviations from PB energies were found for the unbound proteins and the complex. As an alternative to normal‐mode calculations, quasiharmonic analyses have been performed to estimate entropic contributions due to changes of solute flexibility upon binding. However, such entropy estimates do not converge after 10 ns of simulation time, indicating that sampling issues may limit the applicability of this approach. Finally, binding free energies estimated from snapshots of the unbound proteins extracted from the complex trajectory result in an underestimate of binding affinity. This points to the need to exercise caution in applying the computationally cheaper “one‐trajectory‐alternative” to systems where there may be significant changes in flexibility and structure due to binding. The best estimate for the binding free energy of Ras–Raf obtained in this study of −8.3 kcal mol −1 is in good agreement with the experimental result of −9.6 kcal mol −1 , however, further probing the transferability of the applied protocol that led to this result is necessary. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Comput Chem 2: 238–250, 2003
Keywords
Affiliated Institutions
Related Publications
gmx_MMPBSA: A New Tool to Perform End-State Free Energy Calculations with GROMACS
Molecular mechanics/Poisson-Boltzmann (Generalized-Born) surface area is one of the most popular methods to estimate binding free energies. This method has been proven to balanc...
Molecular dynamics and free-energy calculations applied to affinity maturation in antibody 48G7
We investigated the relative free energies of hapten binding to the germ line and mature forms of the 48G7 antibody Fab fragments by applying a continuum model to structures sam...
Computational Alchemy To Calculate Absolute Protein−Ligand Binding Free Energy
The ability to reliably compute accurate protein−ligand binding affinities is crucial to understanding protein−ligand recognition and to structure-based drug design. A ligand's ...
Protein folding and association: Insights from the interfacial and thermodynamic properties of hydrocarbons
Abstract We demonstrate in this work that the surface tension, water‐organic solvent, transfer‐free energies and the thermodynamics of melting of linear alkanes provide fundamen...
The solvation reaction field for a hydrogen atom in a dielectric continuum
A reaction field exists even for a nonpolar solute embedded in a spherical cavity within a surrounding homogeneous dielectric continuum. This arises from the tail of the electro...
Publication Info
- Year
- 2003
- Type
- article
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 238-250
- Citations
- 851
- Access
- Closed
External Links
Social Impact
Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions
Citation Metrics
Cite This
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1002/jcc.10379