Abstract

The impacts of cooperative and competitive efforts on problem solving were compared. In order to resolve the controversy over whether cooperation promotes higher- or lower-quality individual problem solving than does competition, 46 studies, published between 1929 and 1993, were examined. The findings from these studies were classified in 4 categories according to the type of problem solving measured: linguistic (solved through written and oral language), nonlinguistic (solved through symbols, math, motor activities, actions), well-defined (having clearly defined operations and solutions), and ill-defined (lacking clear definitions, operations, and solutions). The 63 relevant findings that resulted were subjected to a meta-analysis for purposes of integration. Members of cooperative teams outperformed individuals competing with each other on all 4 types of problem solving (effect sizes = 0.37, 0.72, 0.52, 0.60, respectively). These results held for individuals of all ages and for studies of high, medium, and low quality. The superiority of cooperation, however, was greater on nonlinguistic than on linguistic problems.

Keywords

Competition (biology)Quality (philosophy)PsychologyOrder (exchange)Cognitive psychologyLinguisticsComputer scienceMathematics educationEconomicsEpistemologyEcology

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

Publication Info

Year
1995
Type
article
Volume
65
Issue
2
Pages
129-143
Citations
473
Access
Closed

External Links

Social Impact

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

473
OpenAlex

Cite This

Zhining Qin, David W. Johnson, Roger T. Johnson (1995). Cooperative Versus Competitive Efforts and Problem Solving. Review of Educational Research , 65 (2) , 129-143. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543065002129

Identifiers

DOI
10.3102/00346543065002129