Abstract

In a study of 150 adult diabetic patients there was a strong correlation between abdominal circumference and body mass index (BMI) (r = 0.85).1 The authors went on to report that the correlation differed in different BMI categories as shown in the table.⇓ View this table: Correlation between abdominal circumference and body mass indeed (BMI) in 1450 adult patients with diabetes The authors’ interpretation of these data was that in patients with low or high BMI values (BMI 35 kg/m2) the correlation was strong, but in those with BMI values between 25 and 35 kg/m2 the correlation was weak or missing. They concluded that measuring abdominal circumference is of particular importance in subjects with the most frequent BMI category (25 to 35 kg/m2). When we restrict the range of one of the variables, a correlation coefficient will be reduced. For …

Keywords

CorrelationStatisticsComputer scienceMathematicsGeometry

MeSH Terms

Body Mass IndexData CollectionFemaleHumansMaleSample SizeStatistics as TopicWaist Circumference

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

Publication Info

Year
2011
Type
article
Volume
342
Issue
mar11 1
Pages
d556-d556
Citations
183
Access
Closed

Social Impact

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

183
OpenAlex
11
Influential
152
CrossRef

Cite This

Martin Bland, David Altman (2011). Correlation in restricted ranges of data. BMJ , 342 (mar11 1) , d556-d556. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d556

Identifiers

DOI
10.1136/bmj.d556
PMID
21398359

Data Quality

Data completeness: 81%