Abstract
Abstract This article examines how large data sets can be used for evaluating the effects of health policy changes and for flagging providers with potential quality problems. An example is presented, illustrating how three risk-adjusted measures of hospital performance were developed using patient discharge abstracts. Advantages and disadvantage of this approach are discussed.
Keywords
Affiliated Institutions
Related Publications
Assessing providers of coronary revascularization: a method for peer review organizations.
OBJECTIVES. Current methods to evaluate quality of care are usually limited to reviews of individual cases or comparisons of hospital mortality rates. We present an alternative ...
MIMIC-III, a freely accessible critical care database
Abstract MIMIC-III (‘Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care’) is a large, single-center database comprising information relating to patients admitted to critical care units...
Clinical Versus Administrative Data Bases for CABG Surgery
This study compared the ability of a clinical and administrative data base in New York State to predict in-hospital mortality and to assess hospital performance for coronary art...
Severity Measurement Methods and Judging Hospital Death Rates for Pneumonia
Payers and policymakers are increasingly examining hospital mortality rates as indicators of hospital quality. To be meaningful, these death rates must be adjusted for patient s...
Staging of Disease
Measurement of illness severity is required to evaluate diagnostic efficiency of physicians, assess quality of care, understand utilization of health services, design clinical t...
Publication Info
- Year
- 1990
- Type
- article
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 229-238
- Citations
- 29
- Access
- Closed
External Links
Social Impact
Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions
Citation Metrics
Cite This
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1017/s0266462300000751