Abstract
A set of criteria based upon biostatistical considerations for determining the interrater reliability of specific adaptive behavior items in a given setting was presented. The advantages and limitations of extant statistical assessment procedures were discussed. Also, a set of guidelines for differentiating type of adaptive behavior that are statistically reliable from those that are reliable in a clinical or practical sense was delineated. Data sets were presented throughout in order to illustrate the advantages of recommended statistical procedures over other available ones.
Keywords
Affiliated Institutions
Related Publications
Being Inconsistent About Consistency: When Coefficient Alpha Does and Doesn't Matter
One of the central tenets of classical test theory is that scales should have a high degree of internal consistency, as evidenced by Cronbach's a, the mean interitem correlation...
A Tool for Reviewers
Peer review lies at the core of science and academic life. In one of its most pervasive forms, peer review for the scientific literature is the main mechanism that research jour...
Publication Info
- Year
- 1981
- Type
- article
- Volume
- 86
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 127-37
- Citations
- 2278
- Access
- Closed