Abstract

This article distinguishes three current theories that purport to account for the etiology of chronic diseases: a germ theory, a lifestyle theory and an environmental theory. Since each of these proposals about disease causality implies a different locus of responsibility for disease prevention, the medical disputes surrounding the theories often mask more fundamental political controversies over the proper organization of society. This article reports briefly on the medical debate accompanying each theory and more fully on the political argument each gives rise to. It concludes with a critique of the multifactorial theory of disease causality, calling it both ineffective and biased against those people most at risk of becoming ill.

Keywords

Causality (physics)PoliticsDiseaseArgument (complex analysis)Positive economicsGerm theory of diseasePolitical philosophyEpistemologyLaw and economicsPolitical scienceSociologyMedicineLawEconomicsPhilosophy

Related Publications

Democratic Peace — Warlike Democracies?

Democracies are Janus-faced. While they do not fight each other, they are frequently involved in militarized disputes and wars with authoritarian regimes. The article argues tha...

1995 European Journal of International Rel... 261 citations

Between Facts and Norms

In Between Facts and Norms Jurgen Habermas works out the legal and political implications of his Theory of Communicative Action (1981), bringing to fruition the project announce...

1996 The MIT Press eBooks 4118 citations

Publication Info

Year
1981
Type
article
Volume
6
Issue
3
Pages
369-390
Citations
35
Access
Closed

External Links

Social Impact

Altmetric

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

35
OpenAlex

Cite This

Sylvia N. Tesh (1981). Disease Causality and Politics. Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law , 6 (3) , 369-390. https://doi.org/10.1215/03616878-6-3-369

Identifiers

DOI
10.1215/03616878-6-3-369