Abstract

As Allport (1954) implied, the content of stereotypes may be systematic, and specifically, ambivalent. We hypothesize two clusters of outgroups, one perceived as incompetent but warm (resulting in paternalistic prejudice) and one perceived as competent but not warm (resulting in envious prejudice). Perceived group status predicts perceived competence, and perceived competition predicts perceived (lack of) warmth. Two preliminary surveys support these hypotheses for 17 outgroups. In‐depth analyses of prejudice toward particular outgroups support ambivalent prejudice: Paternalistic prejudice toward traditional women, as well as envious prejudice toward career women, results in ambivalent sexism (Glick & Fiske, 1996). Envious prejudice toward Asians results in perceived competence but perceived lack of social skills. Ambivalent content reflects systematic principles.

Keywords

Prejudice (legal term)AmbivalencePsychologySocial psychologyIngroups and outgroupsPaternalismCompetence (human resources)Social perceptionPerceptionPolitical science

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

Publication Info

Year
1999
Type
article
Volume
55
Issue
3
Pages
473-489
Citations
875
Access
Closed

External Links

Social Impact

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

875
OpenAlex

Cite This

Susan T. Fiske, Xu Juan, Amy C. Cuddy et al. (1999). (Dis)respecting versus (Dis)liking: Status and Interdependence Predict Ambivalent Stereotypes of Competence and Warmth. Journal of Social Issues , 55 (3) , 473-489. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00128

Identifiers

DOI
10.1111/0022-4537.00128