Abstract

This paper reports on a qualitative field study of 16 hospitals implementing an innovative technology for cardiac surgery. We examine how new routines are developed in organizations in which existing routines are reinforced by the technological and organizational context All hospitals studied had top-tier cardiac surgery departments with excellent reputations and patient outcomes yet exhibited striking differences in the extent to which they were able to implement a new technology that required substantial changes in the operating-room-team work routine. Successful implementers underwent a qualitatively different team learning process than those who were unsuccessful. Analysis of qualitative data suggests that implementation involved four process steps: enrollment, preparation, trials, and reflection. Successful implementers used enrollment to motivate the team, designed preparatory practice sessions and early trials to create psychological safety and encourage new behaviors, and promoted shared meaning and process improvement through reflective practices. By illuminating the collective learning process among those directly responsible for technology implementation, we contribute to organizational research on routines and technology adoption.

Keywords

Context (archaeology)Process (computing)Qualitative researchTeamworkMeaning (existential)Knowledge managementPsychologyMedical educationMedicineComputer scienceSociologyManagement

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

Publication Info

Year
2001
Type
article
Volume
46
Issue
4
Pages
685-716
Citations
1708
Access
Closed

External Links

Social Impact

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

1708
OpenAlex

Cite This

Amy C. Edmondson, Richard M.J. Bohmer, Gary P. Pisano (2001). Disrupted Routines: Team Learning and New Technology Implementation in Hospitals. Administrative Science Quarterly , 46 (4) , 685-716. https://doi.org/10.2307/3094828

Identifiers

DOI
10.2307/3094828