Abstract

This paper presents evidence that “social capital” matters for measurable economic performance, using indicators of trust and civic norms from the World Values Surveys for a sample of 29 market economies. Memberships in formal groups—Putnam's measure of social capital—is not associated with trust or with improved economic performance. We find trust and civic norms are stronger in nations with higher and more equal incomes, with institutions that restrain predatory actions of chief executives, and with better-educated and ethnically homogeneous populations.

Keywords

Stochastic gameSocial capitalEconomicsCapital (architecture)Classical economicsLaw and economicsSociologyEconomic historyHistoryMathematical economicsSocial science

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

The Social Control of Impersonal Trust

How do societies control trust relationships that are not embedded in structures of personal relations? This paper discusses the guardians of impersonal trust and discovers that...

1987 American Journal of Sociology 1672 citations

Publication Info

Year
1997
Type
article
Volume
112
Issue
4
Pages
1251-1288
Citations
7379
Access
Closed

External Links

Social Impact

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

7379
OpenAlex

Cite This

Steve Knack, Philip Keefer (1997). Does Social Capital Have an Economic Payoff? A Cross-Country Investigation. The Quarterly Journal of Economics , 112 (4) , 1251-1288. https://doi.org/10.1162/003355300555475

Identifiers

DOI
10.1162/003355300555475