Keywords
Affiliated Institutions
Related Publications
Sifting the evidence---what's wrong with significance tests? Another comment on the role of statistical methods
The findings of medical research are often met with considerable scepticism, even when they have apparently come from studies with sound methodologies that have been subjected t...
Updated guidance for trusted systematic reviews: a new edition of the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions
On a shelf in the sunny, open‐plan office of Cochrane Australia in Melbourne, there's a large, white ring‐binder that, it's fair to say, hasn't been opened in a while. It's a pr...
RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials
Assessment of risk of bias is regarded as an essential component of a systematic review on the effects of an intervention. The most commonly used tool for randomised trials is t...
Effect size, confidence interval and statistical significance: a practical guide for biologists
Abstract Null hypothesis significance testing (NHST) is the dominant statistical approach in biology, although it has many, frequently unappreciated, problems. Most importantly,...
A robust <i>P</i>‐value for treatment effect in meta‐analysis with publication bias
Abstract Publication bias is a major and intractable problem in meta‐analysis. There have been several attempts in the literature to adapt methods to allow for such bias, but th...
Publication Info
- Year
- 1986
- Type
- article
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 136-137
- Citations
- 159
- Access
- Closed
External Links
Social Impact
Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions
Citation Metrics
Cite This
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1037/0735-7028.17.2.136