Abstract

There has been relatively little systematic investigation of the effect of the number of variables on measures of model fit in structural equation modeling. There is conflicting evidence as to whether measures of fit tend to improve or decline as more variables are added to the model. We consider 3 different types of specification error: minor factors, 2-factor models, and method errors. Using a formal method based on the noncentrality parameter (NCP), we find that root mean squared error of approximation (RMSEA) tends to improve regardless of the type of specification error and that the comparative fit index (CFI) and Tucker-Lewis Index (TLI), generally, though not always, tend to worsen as the number of variables in the model increases. The formal method that we develop can be used to investigate other measures of fit and other types of misspecification.

Keywords

MathematicsStructural equation modelingStatisticsIndex (typography)SpecificationMean squared errorEconometricsType I and type II errorsApplied mathematicsComputer science

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

Publication Info

Year
2003
Type
article
Volume
10
Issue
3
Pages
333-351
Citations
1158
Access
Closed

External Links

Social Impact

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

1158
OpenAlex

Cite This

David A. Kenny, D. Betsy McCoach (2003). Effect of the Number of Variables on Measures of Fit in Structural Equation Modeling. Structural Equation Modeling A Multidisciplinary Journal , 10 (3) , 333-351. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328007sem1003_1

Identifiers

DOI
10.1207/s15328007sem1003_1